Check out these images
surveillance security systems
fingerprints
image CPOA
Fingerprint
Rudy deLeon
Image Center for Action Fund for American Progress
A new re-balance and consideration of the PATRIOT ActVolle video of the event: “The procedure in this year of several provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act in 2001 … sparked a new debate in Congress on the appropriate balance between the authorities in the fight against terrorism agencies law enforcement in the United States and the need for American civil liberties and privacy to preserve, “said said Rudy deLeon, vice president for national security and international policy at the Center for American Progress Fund last event fire Dienstag.Im debate Patriot Act Action Action Fund hosted a discussion with Representative Jane Harman ( D-CA) and Ken Gude, Associate Director of Action of the CAP of the international human rights and responsibility program, on how the government could jeopardize national security, regardless of the article gewährleisten . Umstrittene civil rights in The Patriot Act involved in this year’s ease of access to business records, roving wire tapping provisions applicable technology and monitoring of the person or suspects “lone wolf” who are not related to the digital terrorist organization today. Participants discussed the effectiveness of these provisions and whether they have violated the rights of individuals Privatsphäre.Rep. Harman has served as a member of the Committee the House intelligence for eight years and is currently Chairman of the Subcommittee on Homeland Security on Intelligence and Terrorism Risk Assessment. She explained that a strong national security system does not come at the expense of freedom civilian. “Security and liberty are reinforcing values … it’s not more than one year and less than the other, it is both more or less at a time.” Rep. Harman praised the Obama administration for its national security policy, but said additional measures are needed. It welcomed the commitment of President Barack Obama to close the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, too, and its limitation of the classification of the material by the Homeland Security Department. But they called for more debate on the State Secrets Privilege-a precedent under which asked a court to prove the public affidavit stating that court proceedings might disclose information that could compromise national security based omit wird . Harman commended the current House version of the PATRIOT Act revisions because it is the reading habits of a person prohibit the use as evidence of terrorist activities or bills intent.The also change the target of a roving wiretap single individual, rather than a single phone. Rep. Harman pointed out that the current rules are incongruent with new technologies that can benefit from one person to disposable cell phones. The new technology has drawn the inefficient need a court order for any gemacht.Gude phone supports the end of the provision of lone wolf, Intelligence Surveillance Act investigations only foreign terrorists who are not connected to an organization special permits. He explained that FISA was created to monitor people with foreign powers or terrorist groups, and therefore the threshold for a watching brief was inferior system. He and Rep. Harman agreed that the Lone Wolf provision susceptible to invasion of privacy by the government verlässt.Gude individuals explained that his objection to the provision Lone Wolf is not that the government should be prohibited conducting surveillance of individuals. However, he thought traditional criminal plays were appropriate when no evidence links the person to a foreign terrorist Vereinigung.Harman said that now, because after 9/11, lawmakers do not take the time, “we have the opportunity to new rules in a new environment have to discuss “” get [terrorism] laws right. “She spoke of” authorization to use military force “on groups at 11.9, that” the President has the right to act unilaterally “They called for a new balance of power between the branches of government on issues of national security, said. the laws after 9/11, the President gives too much power to the decisions of the fight against terrorism without spirit machen.Im congressional debate or public checks and balances, Gude said there was hope of a bipartisan consensus on the reform fight against terrorism. “On a question like that there is probably more room for bipartisan commitment than on almost any other issue on the hill at the moment, “he said. Gude and Representative Harman acknowledged the need for reform for robust debate and cooperation narrow national security. Rep. Harman noted that “terrorists are not going to see our party registration before they blow us too, so we really better to be together in this area.”
